Record 004 · Project Flex correspondence
Citizen request
Request for full review of the fifth Project Flex submissionThe email compares the third and fifth submissions and raises concerns about physical redesigns, changed noise-model assumptions, and unresolved off-site drainage improvements and easements.
View original email PDF ↗Requested actions
Four review safeguardsFull Planning Commission review, a cumulative redline, independent review of the raw SoundPLAN files and assumptions, and completed off-site easements before final action.
Correspondence thread
Citizen correspondence · Original email
Asked the Township not to treat the fifth Project Flex submission as a minor correction or grant administrative approval. The email cites site redesigns, changed sound-model inputs and mitigation, and an unsecured drainage easement, and requests four specified review measures.
Archive note: documents are posted as primary sources. John Valenzuela’s personal contact information was redacted for privacy on August 16, 2026; his name and officials’ government contact information were retained. Descriptive summaries are provided for navigation and do not replace the source. Thread status reflects only materials currently published in this archive.